Skip to: Curated Story Group 1
healthcarebusinessreview

Advertise

with us

    • US
    • EUROPE
    • APAC
    • CANADA
  • Home
  • Sections
    Business Process Outsourcing
    Compliance & Risk Management
    Consulting Service
    Dental Billing Services
    Facility Management Services
    Financial Services
    Health Insurance
    Healthcare Digital Marketing
    Healthcare Education
    Healthcare Procurement
    Healthcare Security
    Healthcare Staffing
    Medical Billing
    Medical Case Management
    Medical Transportation
    Multi Speciality
    Patient Monitoring
    Pharmacy Service
    Practice Management Service
    Real Estate Services
    Supply Chain
    Telemedicine Services
    Therapy Services
  • CXO Insights
  • News
  • Vendor Viewpoint
  • Conferences
  • CXO Awards
Welcome back to this new edition of Healthcare Business Review !!!✖
Sign In

Subscribe to our Weekly Newsletter to get latest updates to your inbox
19 September 2022to identify areas where they generate a net profit or loss. A key challenge to answering these questions is most organizations have information about pharmaceutical costs, drug utilization, and reimbursement scattered across different systems and databases that don't communicate with one another. Pharmaceutical costs are managed by the department leader in pharmacy, which can be influenced by drug shortages, contract negotiations with wholesalers, and price escalation. Drug utilization can be monitored by pharmacy but is more often dictated by formulary design and physician behaviors. Finally, the reimbursement of these drugs is managed by a finance and managed care team who are often isolated from the clinical and operational decisions being managed by the patient care team. The result is organizations asking teams to address problems that are not core to their business or experience. The goal should be to promote collaboration between pharmacy and finance to enhance communication, share information, and optimize efficiencies. Prior Authorization. Although touted as a cost-savings measure by health insurers, the practice of prior authorization has an administrative and patient-care burden that requires further evaluation. An effective prior authorization process is essential in preventing patient care delays, preventing denials, and ensuring reimbursement for costly drugs. Often, hospitals and health systems require the provider and clinic staff or a centralized prior authorization team to complete the prior authorization process for their patients. These teams may be ill-equipped to manage the complexity that health care insurers require. The most common criteria involved with prior authorization decisions involve indication, dose, duration, labs and results, and previous therapies. Criteria in which the pharmacy team is most qualified to provide, but rarely involved with the process. In addition to prior authorization requirements, the process has introduced greater scrutiny over the years:· Biosimilars are biologic drugs that are highly similar to and have no clinically meaningful difference from an existing biologic medicine (the reference product) that is already licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Biosimilars represent a unique opportunity to reduce health care costs yet have barriers to adoption and implementation. One barrier is that health care insurers each have different preferred biosimilars (or prefer the reference/originator product) on their respective formularies and reimburse at markedly different rates depending on the drug. This can result in confusion at the prior authorization stage as each biosimilar has a unique J-Code (Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System procedure codes for non-orally administered medication and chemotherapy drugs) that must also align with the insurers formulary. Coupled with the known challenges of linking drug costs with reimbursement, it is probably that most hospitals and health systems are unaware of how to maximize reimbursement within this class of drugs. · Step therapy is another cost-saving tactic employed by health insurers that requires patients to try a lower cost drug before trying a similar-acting, but most expensive drug. Though this practice has been utilized in retail pharmacy for years, increased utilization of these tactics in hospital outpatient departments have been noted. Appropriate documentation and rationale for treatment decisions could be the difference between timely payment and a denial. · Site of care can be dictated by insurers where the choice for physical location of infusion administration is dependent Andre HarvinUNFORTUNATELY, IN MANY HEALTH SYSTEMS THERE EXISTS A BARRIER BETWEEN HEALTH SYSTEM FINANCE AND PHARMACY LEADERS THAT PREVENT THE LEVEL OF SYNERGY REQUIRED TO STRENGTHEN THE PHARMACY REVENUE INTEGRITY OPPORTUNITY
< Page 9 | Page 11 >